







Compsec Publications:







Our Conference





aCompsec Online is a
amember of:
|
Computer Law
& Security Report Premium Article Archive |
Pay Per View available via:

Subscribers to any Compsec Publications can receive
free online access via:

For further information visit our subscriber
zone.
|
|
 |
This Premium Article Archive offers the last
12 months of articles from Computer Law
and Security Report. Each summary takes you through
to our Science Direct Pay Per View service which will allow
you to buy 24 hour access to the article for just $30.
NB. Subscibers to this publication can view these articles
for free through the subscriber
zone.
Like to subscribe? Click here
for details |
| Premium Article Archive: |
Blogs, lies and the doocing: The next hotbed of litigation? - Vol 22 (2006) no 3
Article Summaries:
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Volume 21, Issue 2
Foundations of computer
forensics: A technology for the fight against computer crime
With the rapid advance in computer and network technology,
computer-based electronic evidence has increasingly played
an important role in the courtroom over the last decade. Computer
forensics, a growing discipline rooted in forensic science
and computer security technology, focuses on acquiring electronic
evidence from computer systems to prosecute computer crimes,
national security threats, and computer abuse. It has lost
its mystique as a technique used solely by law enforcement
and intelligence agents, and has become a popular and powerful
application employed by corporations for civil disputes, employee
terminations, and intellectual property proceedings. This
article provides an introduction to computer forensics and
outlines the associated inspection steps.

|
| back to top |
|
Computer Law
& Security Report
Volume 21, Issue 2
Identity theft in
an online world
With the aid of an example case of identity theft used to
perpetrate an apparent benefits fraud and consideration of
other undesirable online activities, the authors examine the
motives and methods of Internet-based identity theft. Consideration
is given to how such cases may be detected, investigated and
prevented in the future. The problem of trust relationships
and validation of identity tokens is discussed and recommendations
for the prevention of identity theft are given.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Volume 20, September/October 2004
Using technology
to protect copyright works
Significant changes were made to copyright and neighbouring
rights by the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003,
implementing Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament
and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of
certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information
society.1 The main thrust of the Directive (itself a response
to the WIPO Copyright and Performances and Phonograms Treaties)
was to bring copyright and other rights up to date to reflect
technological change in particular, though not limited to,
the use of the internet as a means of disseminating and exploiting
copyright works and other subject matter. Although the Directive
should have been implemented by 22 December 2002, the Regulations
did not come into force until 31 October 2003. This was largely
a reflection of the scale and complexity of the changes brought
about by the Directive. This article reviews the implementation
that has occurred.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Volume 20, September/October 2004
The protection of
databases under EU and US law – the sui generis right
as an appropriate concept? Part II
The continuation of Jorg Hladjk's article analysing the legal
protection of databases in the EU and US and particularly
the economic effects of the new sui generis right.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Volume 20, September/October 2004
The world's current
legislative efforts against cyber crime
We now know and understand the problem; cyber crime. We have
experts all over the world developing ways to stop and track
it. The problem now becomes: how do we fight this international
problem? The very strength of cyber crime is the very weakness
of our efforts to control it: being able to cross international
lines. A click of a button can digitally transport thieves
and terrorists 5 000 miles and across 20 borders. Attempting
to monitor and prosecute these type of criminals is possible
but requires cooperation across those borders; cooperation
that the criminal need not acquire. A system needs to be developed
that will allow nation victims of cyber crime to swiftly prosecute
these criminals without stepping on the toes of another nation's
sovereignty. Nations must have in place their own domestic
cyber laws but must also have a system that allows for collaboration
with other countries. Many systems have emerged globally and
many of the big pieces may already be in place to harmonize
cyber law worldwide.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Volume 20, July/August 2004
The protection of
databases under US and EU law
Sui generis right as an appropriate concept? – Part
I – US law

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Volume 20, July/August 2004
Data protection and
business sales – risks and solutions?
Buying and selling businesses can create some difficult data
protection issues. How can the seller, for example, disclose
employee and customer information to prospective buyers for
due diligence purposes without breaching the Data Protection
Act? To what extent can customer data collected by the seller
be used by the buyer for new or different purposes going forward?
Similar issues arise in outsourcing transactions where the
outsourcing service provider may want access to employee or
other data to conduct due diligence. In this article, we examine
the key data protection rules and identify pragmatic solutions
to manage these risks.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Vol 20 (2004), no 4
Software
licensing under the competition law spotlight – the
new technology transfer block exemption
Mark Turner1 and Dominic Callaghan
The new technology transfer block exemption regulation ("the
new TTBER") came into force on 1 May 2004. For the first
time software copyright has been bought within the block exemption.
The new TTBER radically reforms the treatment of technology
agreements under EU competition law. It thrusts software licensing
firmly into the competition law spotlight and will lead to
a closer scrutiny of the background to software licences and
of individual provisions. This article examines the new rules
and explores the issues involved.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Vol 20 (2004), no 4
Press
reigned in by House of Lords decision
Marcus Turle
On 6 May 2004 Naomi Campbell walked victorious from the
House of Lords [Campbell (Appellant) v MGN Limited (Respondents)]
after successfully claiming against the Daily Mirror for invasion
of privacy.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Vol 20 (2004), no 3
"The
voice of reason" … finding middle ground in IT
contracts
Kit Burden, Report Correspondent,
Co-Head
As most IT-focused lawyers will confirm, there are a number
of contract provisions which will almost always be the subject
of debate during negotiations. Whilst describing a particular
approach as being in line with "market practice"
is not necessarily the best tactic to adopt, it is nonetheless
helpful to have in mind the kinds of compromise positions
which have been commonly reached in other circumstances, so
as to get a feel for where the middle ground may be. principles.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Vol 20 (2004), no 3
International
data transfers between the United States and the European
Union: are the procedural provisions of the Safe Harbor solution
adequate?
Alexander Zinser Dr., jur, LLM,
Senior Attorney
Data transfers out of the European Union are only admissible
if the third country ensures an adequate level of protection.
With regard to the United States, organizations may adhere
to so-called Safe Harbor principles whereby an adequate level
of protection is admitted. This article reviews the relevant
procedural provisions on granting the Safe Harbor status.
It concludes that the current system does not really safeguard
compliance with the Safe Harbor principles.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Vol 20 (2004), no 3
Validating
identity for the electronic environment
Stephen Mason, Barrister
Many politicians the world over consider that it is cheaper
and more effective for government agencies to communicate
with citizens electronically, via the internet, in the future.
For example, it will be compulsory for all businesses in the
United Kingdom to submit certain types of End of Year Returns
electronically by 2010. However, the fraudulent use of individual
identity has increased at an alarming rate. The use of electronic
communications and reliance upon electronic databases poses
serious problems relating to the validation, verification
and authentication of identity in the electronic environment.
This article will consider some of the implications surrounding
the issues relating to the identification of a person. It
does not consider the authentication of the computer application.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Vol 20 (2004), no 3
The Court
of Appeal's interpretation of "personal data" in
Durant v FSA – a welcome clarification, or a cat amongst
the data protection pigeons?
Simon Chalton, Solicitor and Consultant
This article considers the effect of the Court of Appeal's
judgment in Durant v FSA on the scope of data protection regulation,
and the possibility of conflict with EU Directive 95/46.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Vol 20 (2004), no 2
Carnivore
in an ECHELON world - Part II
Talitha Nabbali, BSc (Hons) Graduate
2002 and Mark Perry, Assistant Professor Faculty of Science
(Computer Science) Faculty of Law
Carnivore is a surveillance technology, a software program
housed in a computer unit, which is installed by properly
authorized FBI agents on a particular Internet Service Provider's
(ISP) network. The Carnivore software system is used together
with a tap on the ISP's network to "intercept, filter,
seize and decipher digital communications on the Internet".
The system is described as a "specialized network analyzer"
that works by "sniffing" a network and copying and
storing a warranted subset of its traffic. In the FBI's own
words "Carnivore chews on all data on the network, but
it only actually eats the information authorized by a court
order". This article, in two parts, provides an overview
of the FBI's Carnivore electronic surveillance system.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Vol 20 (2004), no 2
The airline
passenger data disclosure case and the EU-US debate
María Verónica Pérez
Asinari, Researcher and Yves Poullet, Dean of the Faculty
of Law, Director of the CRID
In the aftermath of the events of 11 September 2001, decisions
have been taken unilaterally by US authorities requiring air
line companies to provide direct access or transfer of data
concerning passengers and cabin crews flying to, from or within
the US to certain US administrations. These decisions have
been challenged by EU authorities insofar they constitute
a violation of EU privacy and personal data protection law
which is considered to be of public order. The debate is still
pending. This article will comment on this complex and multi-featured
discussion opposing two fundamental societal values: on the
one hand, the right of the citizens to be protected from terrorism
and the obligation of a sovereign State to fight against it
and safeguard public security, [1] and on the other hand,
the individuals' right to personal data protection and privacy
and the obligation of the EU, in the light of international
and supranational commitments, to protect them in this arena.
After a short presentation of the US decisions and their context,
the authors will analyse the EU position, its claim for adequate
personal data protection to be ensured by the US authorities
and the legal grounds for this position. Finally, a synthetic
approach to the adequacy of the US decisions vis-à-vis
the EU legal provisions will be proposed.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Vol 20 (2004), no 2
Implementation
of the e-Privacy Directive in the UK – understanding
the new rules
Colleen Donovan, Partner
Any legislation implementing EU rules in an area of developing
technology is bound to bring with it questions of interpretation.
The UK's Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive)
Regulations 2003/2426 (which implement the e-Privacy Directive
(2002/58/EC) and replace 1999 Regulations implementing the
Telecoms Data Protection Directive (97/66/EC)) are no exception,
particularly in relation to direct marketing communications,
on which subject the e-Privacy Directive lacks clarity in
several key areas. This article explores the new rules and
assesses their implications.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Vol 20 (2004), no 1
Regulation
of electronic communications networks and services in the
UK – Part II
Andrew Sharpe and Charles Russell
Part I of this Article dealt with the general conditions
of entitlement (the "General Conditions") published
as part of the authorisation regime introduced to regulate
electronic communications networks and services ("ECNS")
under the Communications Act 2003 (the "Act") as
at 1 September 2003. This Part II will cover the other changes
to the regulation of electronic communications that the Act
introduces. In particular, it will deal with OFCOM's enforcement
powers, the new disputes and appeals procedure introduced
by the Act, the notification and administrative charging regime
that replaces the Telecommunications Act 1984 ("T Act")
licence fees regime and the replacement of the T Act Telecommunications
Code with the Electronic Communications Code. It will also
cover the changes to the regulation of spectrum, including
the introduction of spectrum trading and the grant of recognised
spectrum access, included in the Act. Lastly, this Part II
will also pick up on any developments in the General Conditions
since the publication of Part I and any other regulation developments
up until 7 November 2003.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Vol 20 (2004), no 1
Draft
directive on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions
The
European Parliament's amendments - have the proposals been
wrecked?
Alexander Batteson
This article explores the current state of play in the attempts
by the European Commission to secure the passage of the proposed
directive on computer implemented inventions.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Vol 20 (2004), no 1
UK implementation
of the Copyright in the Information Society Directive
Trevor Cook
On 31 October 2003 the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations
2003[1] ("the Regulations"), which implement EC
Directive 2001/29/EC on the Harmonisation of Certain Aspects
of Copyright in the Information Society ("the Directive"),
came into force. They extensively, and yet further, amend
the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 ("the Act"),
the increasingly ragged patchwork of a statute which reflects
the ravages wrought over the last decade on UK copyright law
by the harmonisation programme of the European Commission
in this area. This article reviews the UK's implementation
and concludes that there is still work to be done at Community
level.

|
| back to top |
| Computer
Law & Security Report
Vol 19(2003), no 6
Regulation
of electronic communications networks and services in the
UK – Part I
Andrew Sharpe and Charles Russell
This Article sets out in detail the authorisation regime
introduced to regulate electronic communications networks
and services under the Communications Act 2003, with Part
I setting out the general conditions of entitlement as at
1 September 2003. The Act also provides for the regulation
of spectrum use, including the introduction of a power to
develop new mechanisms to enable spectrum to be traded and
a scheme of recognised spectrum access. These matters will
be covered in Part II.

|
| back to top |
Computer Law & Security
Report
Vol 19 (2003), no 2
Cyber
Crime - A new breed of criminal?
Kit Burden and Creole Palmer
The "cyber criminal" sounds like a term to be
applied to someone from a William Gibson book, and yet is
all too real, and on a day to day basis wreaks havoc in our
increasingly online world. In April 2001, the Government responded
to this threat by announcing a $25 million initiative involving
the creation of a National High-Tech Crime Unit to counter
the growing use of the Internet for criminal activity. The
online world is becoming increasingly vulnerable to criminal
activity with 43% of the public identifying cyber crime as
a `problem'.
This article accordingly seeks to summarize the key areas
of online criminal activity in order to summarise the types
of crime which we are dealing with, and to seek to place them
in an appropriate context in which their impact can be judged.
At the outset, we should seek to distinguish between "true"
cyber crime (i.e. dishonest or malicious acts which would
not exist outside of an online environment, or at least not
in the same kind of form or with anything like the same impact),
and crime which is simply "e-enabled" (i.e. a criminal
act known to the world before the advent of the worldwide
web, but which is now increasingly perpetrated over the Internet).

|
| back to top |
Computer Law & Security
Report
Vol 19 (2003), no 2
European
and American Privacy: Commerce, Rights and Justice - part
II
Carter H. Manny
In a commercial context, there are strong moral arguments
in favor of personal privacy using either a rights-based analysis
or a justice-based analysis. The gap between European and
American thinking about legal protection for personal privacy
is partially explained by the emphasis that Europeans place
on a rights-based approach, and the different way in which
that approach is interpreted in the United States. This article
suggests that the philosophical gap could be narrowed by placing
greater emphasis on moral principles of justice in the European-
US privacy dialogue. Part I of this article appeared in the
last issue.

|
| back to top |
Computer Law & Security
Report
Vol 19 (2003), no 1
European
and American Privacy: Commerce, Rights and Justice - part
I
Introduction
Governments in Europe and the United States have taken different
approaches to protection of consumer privacy. Europe has comprehensive
privacy statutes known as data protection laws covering all
private and governmental organizations which collect and use
personal data. Each European law is administered by state
or national data protection agencies. Although the US has
a privacy statute which applies generally to the federal government,1
there is no comprehensive privacy law covering the private
sector. Instead, privacy is protected through a patchwork
of sector-specific statutes, industry self-regulation and
market forces.
 |
| back to top |
Computer Law & Security
Report
Vol 18 (2002), no 6
Electronic
Workplace Privacy in France
Nancy E. Muenchinger
Electronic workplace privacy has emerged as a legal issue
in France, coinciding with growth in the use of Internet,
including its most popular feature, electronic mail, in the
working environment. The article explores French policy towards
the issue and where matters stand at present.

|
| back to top |
Computer Law & Security
Report
Vol 18 (2002), no 5
Damned
if you do, Damned if you don't? A look at data retention policies
in the aftermath of Enron
Rowan Middleton and Herbert Smith
"...an unparalleled initiative was undertaken to shred
physical documentation and delete computer files..... A systematic
effort was also undertaken and carried out to purge the computer
hard-drives and email system of Enron-related files".1
This was the claim made by the Department of Justice against
the bankrupt energy company, Enron's auditor, Arthur Andersen,
LLP. Andersen hotly contested this and the other allegations
made against it, claiming that the indictment was "wholly
unsupported by the facts".2 The jury disagreed and on
15 June 2002, found it guilty of obstructing the course of
justice. This article explores the impact of the case on data
retention policies under UK law

|
| back to top |
Computer Law & Security
Report
Vol 18 (2002), no 4
The Evidential
Issues Relating to Electronic Signatures - Part II
Stephen Mason
Both the Government and industry are keenly promoting the
use of electronic signatures. It is assumed that the widespread
use of electronic signatures will encourage greater use of
the Internet as a means to buy goods and services. This article,
in two parts, looks at the evidential issues relating to electronic
signatures, and illustrates the weakness of the infrastructure
which, in turn, highlights the risks that both users and recipients
encounter when using electronic signatures.

|
| back to top |
Computer law & Security
Report
Vol 18 (2002), no 3
The Evidential
Issues Relating to Electronic Signatures - Part I
Stephen Mason
Both the Government and the industry are keenly promoting
the use of electronic signatures. It is assumed that the widespread
use of electronic signatures will encourage greater use of
the Internet as a means to buy goods and services. This article
looks at the evidential issues relating to electronic signatures,
and illustrates the weakness of the infrastructure which,
in turn, highlights the risks that both users and recipients
encounter when using electronic signatures.

|
| back to top |
Computer Law & Security
Report
Vol 18 (2002), no 2
Intellectual
Property Issues in E-Learning
Gabriela Kennedy
The growth in the distance education market is leading to
the commodification of education. Education is nowadays available
beyond school, college and university, on CD-ROM or online.1
Private sector partners in joint ventures with traditional
universities are entering the distance education/e-learning
market and are competing with traditional universities. Several
types of intellectual property rights are bundled in distance
learning courses. Written texts or drawings attract copyright;
special technology or business methods for the course may
attract patent protection. Finally, the ultimate packaging
and branding of a distance/e-learning course is an essential
factor on which the effective marketing of the course depends.
Traditionally, universities developed intellectual property
policies that, by and large, dealt with inventions. The legal
challenges of apportioning copyright in distance-learning
materials and of managing trademarks and brands effectively
are just beginning to be appreciated. These issues are discussed
below.

|
| back to top |
Computer Law & Security
Report
Vol 18 (2002), no 1
Europe
in the E-economy: Challenges for EU Enterprises and Policies
Patrick Vittet-Philippe, Expert
Advisor DG Enterprise
Europe is in the middle of an e-business revolution. Driven
by information and communication technologies (ICTs), this
revolution is not merely about technology. Nor is it simply
about cutting costs and improving production processes. It
is about radical structural changes in the economy -- changes
within companies and in the relationships between companies;
changes in the traditional roles of intermediaries, customers
and competitors, changes in the way value is created. This
article explores the challenges for the EU e-economy and what
needs to be done in terms of policy development to compete
in the new environment.

|
| back to top |
Back to Premium Articles
|
|